8 Books I Read in October

8 Books I Read in October


This was a somewhat weird reading month for me, I picked up several rather random books in addition to a couple that I have been on my must-read list. No regrets, though, I enjoyed everything I read and it’s good to occasionally stray from one’s default mode. Here’s what I managed to finish:

1. We Are the Weather by Jonathan Safran Foer. This is a very personal meditation on the climate crisis and the need for individual action, in particular regarding what we eat. If you keep yourself informed on the topic, there will be very little new here. I already believe the crisis is real, I know that we need to drastically reduce our meat (and other animal products) intake – I wanted a more in depth and practical look at that, which I didn’t get. It does make some good points, especially about personal responsibility, but if you have time for one climate crisis book only, go for The Uninhabitable Earth.

2. Gideon the Ninth by Tamsyn Muir. GtN was my most anticipated read of the month, I had been looking forward to this since Tor promised ‘lesbian necromancers in space’. It turned out to be less epic and less space-y (and maybe a bit less lesbian, although it definitely has queer characters) than I expected and it takes a while for the book to really get going. That said, it is fun and unique, even if it is more horror-leaning fun than I thought it would be and almost a closed room mystery instead of a space adventure. If you are looking for something rather dark and badass with lots of banter and cool female characters, it’s still a good one to check out. And the sequel sounds even more like my thing.

3. How to do Nothing by Jenny Odell. Do not read this if you expect a self-help book: How to do Nothing is a thoughtful and intelligent/intellectual look at the attention economy and how to resist it. Odell is not some fundamentalist who wants us all to live in the woods with no technology, she advocates a life that pays attention to our surroundings (nature in particular) and is anchored in time and space. I recommend reading this in tandem with Jia Tolentino’s Trick Mirror that looks at some similar themes from a different angle.

4. Whose Story is This? by Rebecca Solnit. I am exactly the type of woman you would expect to read and like Solnit. For some reason, I have not always clicked with her entirely, but I did very much enjoy this book, especially the first half or two thirds. I think I prefer it when she addresses very current affairs, her more general musings (as for example in The Field Guide to Getting Lost) tend to leave me rather cold. If you want an intelligent, feminist, progressive look at the issues we face today – with a focus on the US – you could do much worse than this.

5. The Hatred of Poetry by Ben Lerner. Lerner’s book was all over the more poetic part of Bookstagram a year or two ago, but it passed me by. I saw it at Brussels Waterstones last week and decided to give it a go – encouraged by the fact that it is a slim volume. I’m very glad I did, it’s an eloquent and insightful examination of poetry; it’s also witty in a very high-brow way. The book clearly has a limited target group, there is no point to pick it up if you don’t like to think about art and writing in a conceptual way, but if you do, this is a pleasure to read.

6. The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick. Despite my undying love for Science Fiction, there are still huge holes in my classic SF education. One of them has been PKD-shaped (if you prefer ‘Dick-shaped’, feel free to use this term instead) and I’m very happy that I finally managed to get to The Man in the High Castle. I’m sure you know the premise – the Axis powers have won WWII and the world has been divided between Germany and Japan. Against this background, Dick examines power dynamics, cultural hierarchies, individual struggles and the potential for good and evil that exists everywhere, at all times. Atwood and Orwell will probably always remain my favourite writers of dystopias, but this is absolutely a worthy addition to the canon. It is also less weird than most of PKD’s oeuvre.

7. The Clans of the Alphane Moon by Philip K. Dick. Talking about the weirder end of PKD’s spectrum, I also read The Clans of the Alphane Moon last month (on Kindle, therefore not pictured). It is difficult to describe, suffice it to say it involves clans of mentally ill people who have formed their own society on an isolated moon. As is usually the case, PKD’s imagination is off the scale, I just wish he had paid more attention to character development and narrative logic as well. If The Man in the High Castle is something I would recommend to everyone interested in the genre, The Clans of the Alphane Moon is for Dick-connoisseurs only.

8. Žižek’s Jokes by Slavoj Žižek. I very much enjoyed this collection of jokes from Žižek’s work (found entirely by accident in a Brussels bookshop): he loves to illustrate his points on Hegel and on philosophical ideas in general with anecdotes, which I find rather delightful by default. Someone called this ‘intellectual dad humour’ and I agree – most of the jokes are not that good, quite a few are embarrassing and a majority not acceptable in polite conversation (there are jokes about Jews, Gypsies, god, etc). It helps if you are at least somewhat familiar with the Soviet/Communist context and Žižek’s work, to avoid succumbing to indignation.

What did you read in October? And what’s on your TBR? Mine is ridiculously long, as always, but I’m very excited to get to it.

10 Comments

Add yours
  1. 1
    Suss

    As all bloggers I have also posted a wrap-up. I’m not sure what to read next however. There seems to be two options: several books that take place in (at least partly) America (for example a Steinbeck, Americanha, a book called the Dollmaker and that book about the LA riots) or spending November reading some very chunky books about the 30s and 40s ( for example The Mandarins by SdB and Alone in Berlin by Fallada, the previously mentioned Stenbeck would work in this category as well ).

    • 2
      Ykkinna

      These are some very cool choices, not the usual Bookstagram fare – something I’ve come to value more and more. Also, I envy you for reading Homegoing for the first time. I’m thinking of rereading this, but that’s a different experience. Anyhoo, happy that you liekd it as much s I did.

  2. 3
    Amy

    I am so with you on JSF. I find him sort of intolerable, actually, and there are as you note, much better versions of the argument. I also recently read the Tolentino and Odell and found them a nice pairing. Tolentino is much better on some thing than others, but I’ve been absolutely in the mood for this sort of reading. If you haven’t read it, Leslie Jamieson’s new collection of essays is very very good. More like Solnit than like Tolentino or Odell, but I have come much to prefer Jamieson to Solnit. Not sure why. Maybe less obvious? And just for women essayists/non-fiction writers have you read Olivia Laing? I also really liked Rachel Cusk’s recent collection of essays. Like I said, I am in that zone!

    • 4
      Ykkinna

      Note taken of Jemieson and Zambreno, I have not read them. I have read – and love – Olivia Laing. I adore her non-fiction (still have To the River to read), but wasn’t a big fan of Crudo. And I probably would like Cusk’s essays. I enjoyed her Outline, but then got very annoyed with this being presented as some sort of revolutionary text and haven’t read anything else by her. I also have the tendency to get fed up with a certain type of white middle-aged super-woke female thinking, if I read it too much – not because I disagree, rather the opposite. It is very close to my own thinking and sometimes it can feel all the same and hypocritical and self-absorbed. I remember when Ariel Levy was accused of being blind to her privilege, but I actually felt that more about Maggie Nelson… Oh, well. Sorry about this little rant. I don’t know if you are on Instagram, but I wrote a mini-review on Odell and Tolentino and why I think they complement each other well.

      Why do you have a big fight with Lerner’s book? Not arguing, just curious. I’m not sure I managed to follow his thinking at all times, but his mind seems extremely nimble and his writing elegantly precise. I have already considered picking up his latest book.

  3. 5
    Amy

    And I have a big fight with Lerner’s hatred of poetry book, although I need to go back to it probably, but his most recent novel is as good as it is said to be. Given that I have to plug Kate Zambreno, who writes novels, essays, and book length non-ficiton that bends genres in a Lerner-esque way and whose work I love.

  4. 6
    Amy

    I am with you on all of this actually! Didn’t like Crudo despite loving Laing’s other books. Only really liked the last of the Cusk trilogy and then the essays. And I could really go on a Maggie Nelson rant. I like Bluets a lot but have major issues with the rest. Also have you read Essayism my Brian Dillon. It’s amazing.

    Lerner is fighting with an idea of poetry I don’t think that many people have any more. Or maybe I just don’t have it so it felt a little tendentious. But I need to revisit.

    • 7
      Ykkinna

      If you have time at some point, I would love to hear your Nelson rant! And I see what you mean with Lerner, he does set up a straw man with this idea of the perfect poem and its impossibility. I didn’t mind, though, as I didn’t take it too seriously – the whole book is rather playful. I assumed he was exaggerating on purpose (who really does hate poetry? and out of the ones who do, I guess about five people might do it for the reasons Lerner describes) and not hiding it at all and using it as an excuse to say interesting/beautiful/witty things.

  5. 8
    Amy

    My guess is that you are right about Lerner and I was just in a mood when I read it. I also teach a fair number of students who do read poetry the way Lerner – rightly! – hates, so maybe I was taking it too seriously.

    Nelson is a tough one for me. I’ve read almost everything she’s written. Her book on women in the New York School of poets, while academic, is really smart and fun. But her prose and poetry always – often? – feels exploitative to me. It’s her aunt she never met’s murder or a close friend’s terrible accident (I know the friend slightly and she loves Nelson, so this is vexed for me too), or her partner’s reassignment surgery. I know she writes about this dynamic in The arganauts, but it isn’t enough for me. As a trans friend of mine said, it just seems like a cis woman ‘Christopher Columbus-ing trans experience.’ So there’s my too long answer!

    • 9
      Ykkinna

      Regarding Lerner, I think I’m also less invested in the topics he discusses, so it’s easier for me to treat it simply like an enjoyable intellectual game. When I have more developed views on issues, I can be put off by a detail and never recover🙂

      On Nelson: I was reading The Argonauts and I don’t remember exactly what she was saying, but I remember clearly almost shouting at the book that DON’T YOU REALISE WHAT A PRIVILEGE IT IS THAT THESE ARE THE PROBLEMS YOU ARE HAVING!!?? I don’t mean to diminish any personal suffering or obstacles queer people face, but I got really pissed off at the lack of perspective and self awareness, especially in someone who basically is making a living out of being self-aware.

+ Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.