Why I Changed My Mind About Borrowing Clothes (Kind Of)
If you are a regular reader, you know my blog features – almost exclusively – things I have bought myself and actually wear or use. There have been a few exceptions, but they are rather rare. It’s been important to me for two reasons: to be independent from brands and PR companies and also to project an image that isn’t too far from my real life.
Recently, however, I have changed my mind to a certain extent. My overall philosophy remains intact: I’m fiercely uncommercial, write about what I want and say what I please. But I have included clothes on my photos that I have borrowed and in some cases don’t plan to buy – although I always like them, otherwise they wouldn’t be on the pictures.
This is not because I have been seduced by free loot offered by brands, although I admit I do enjoy working with people who are knowledgeable about fashion and that can be a draw. The reason why I’ve gradually revised my policy on this is that I own lots of clothes already and my blog is a constant motivator to buy more. I get inspired by new trends and just inspired in general and then I want to show it all here and on Instagram. And that often incentivises me to get stuff that my wardrobe doesn’t really need.
There are also occasions when I realise that something I would need for the shoot is in Brussels (I’m usually shooting in Tallinn). Or when I need something specific to make an image work. Or there is a visual idea I want to illustrate and I do own a suitable item, but I have shown it on the blog twice already and it’s getting boring.
I could (and I have) in these cases bought new things to keep my principles pristine, but I have decided it’s stupid. Things bought in haste for one shoot aren’t generally of the best quality and most longevity (there are occasional exceptions, like this coat). I feel guilty of accumulating these disposable pieces. Even if they aren’t disposable, they still mean buying more stuff. It is better for the planet, for my wardrobe, for my consciousness and I think, ultimately, for you, to borrow something from a show room and take it back, so that others can use it as well.
I hope this makes sense to you and you don’t feel that I’ve sold out. Of all the content on the blog, it only concerns the style section* and overall, most of the clothes are still going to be mine. When that is not the case, I’m going to indicate it clearly, as I always do. Please let me know if any of this makes you uncomfortable: it is extremely important to me that you can continue to trust my opinions.
When contemplating today’s theme, I also realised that I would like to do some posts where I feature things that have already been on the blog, but with different styling. Normal people – me included – don’t buy new things for every day or event. We wear our favourite pieces again and again, varying the accessories or hair and makeup or the accompanying items. I already have several posts on this in the making and I’m very excited about them, because I’ve seen the first images.
Another thing I’d like to do is give a more serious go to vintage shopping. I do it occasionally, but I’m in no way experienced and would like to be better. We all know that a 30 piece capsule wardrobe is not going to be realistic for me. I will, however, attempt to be more sustainable in other ways that match my personality and style better.
Let me know what you think.
*It could at some point become an issue with skincare as well, as I do buy so much and some of it is clearly motivated by the blog. Still, skincare is easier to handle, as I can get samples and travel sizes, so I’ve kept it 98% based on my own purchases. Makeup, books, food and other things have never been gifted, I believe.
Dress by H&M Studio (on loan), gloves from Ivo Nikkolo (on loan), shoes by Aldo (bought by me). Image Stina Kase.
Not an issue for me either personally or “philosophically” when it comes to fashion: if I see a specific item that I like or the general idea, I wouldn’t really care if you bought it yourself, borrowed or got as a “sample” from the brand – I either like it and want to buy or think that it’s not for me. Trusting you just means that I come to your blog (vs. thousands others that are out there) because I like your style or the way you write about it.
With skincare or perfumes it’s slightly different for me: subconsciously we’re less critical of things that just lended on our lap. It’s one thing if you had to pay $200 for a jar of some lip caviar (an imaginary product), used it up and think of buying the next one – then I realize that it must be really good. But if you were to review some $200 face refresh mist that was sent to you by the brand, even if after a glowing review you were to conclude that it was too expensive, I would internally question whether it was really that great. But even more so I’d do it if you were to write that it was worth every penny. It won’t prevent me from reading your blog but I’d keep my salt shaker closer 🙂
Make-up though is in the same category as clothes for me.
Thank you for such a thorough comment! And it’s a good point, there are differences between categories: I think it comes mostly from the fact that I don’t necessarily ‘review’ clothes the way I review skincare and as you say, with clothes you either like them or not, while with skincare you want to know whether it’s effective. Personally, I often feel that I’m actually more critical with things that are sent to me (not that it has happened often and I haven’t really featured much of it, if any), especially if it’s something expensive. What I do think will inevitably happen – and that is the case with clothes as well – is a sort of ‘availability bias’. You will feature something because you have it instead of something else that you haven’t been sent/haven’t borrowed. And you might be perfectly objective in your opinions and genuinely like it, but it’s still a distortion af a sort. Ah, well, nothing is perfect. And as I said, with skincare this is not really an issue, I buy the vast majority of stuff myself.
Totally on board with this. If it works for you and is clear to your readers then that is a good solution to the problem of disposability. One of the many reasons I love your blog is because it’s your stuff, your life, and your eye which puts it all together: a few borrowed items won’t change that. Also, very pleased at the prospect of a series of old favourites being restyled – again, this is much a more interesting and realistic approach (therefore attractive and inspiring) than magazine pages full of new stuff all the time, which just make me irritable and bored (yes I read waaay too many September magazines this year and now feel disgusting).
Thank you for the support! I will always be very clear what is what. And I’m also excited for my restyling posts, but partly because the location for the shoot is great🙂
I trust you. I just want to see things you really like, it doesn’t matter if they’re borrowed, given as a gift or bought. 🙂
Thank you. This is such a lovely thing to hear. I really am lucky with my readers.
A bit off topic, but having been inspired by you, I ordered the dress on the photo above. Just received it and it is absolutely fabulous!! Great shape and great fabrics. I’ll definitely wear it with a blazer for the office and with chunky jewelry for a date night.
This is completely on topic! That’s so rewarding to hear and I’m obviously super happy that you like the dress. I’m planning to wear it to work soon, too.
I saw you back in NST and thought I would comment on this piece. If you are still non-commercial and accept things on loan for cost avoidance, then it makes sense to change your policy, disclose the source of the items and update your About Me since that has changed. As to make-up, perfume, food, etc. again, as long as you disclose the source and stay true to whatever your policies are as to negative reviews, I don’t see why you couldn’t accept such things for trial.
Hi there, so good to see you! And a very good point, too, I had kind of forgotten about my About section… I will update and link to this post. Cost avoidance isn’t really the main issue (I can afford an H&M sweater here and a Zara top there, although it can add up when I have several shoots in one week), I just genuinely feel bad when buying things only/mostly for shoots and accumulating stuff that I don’t really need. In any case, I should make this clear where people would look for that kind of info.
And I agree there is no fundamental issue with being gifted beauty/perfume, but I have seen that it can be a slippery slope. Then again, if I suddenly want to do more perfume reviews, for example, it is not excluded that I would convince myself to accept bottles for similar reasons I borrow clothes. But that’s not really in the cards at the moment.
Thanks again for stopping by and bringin my attention to an important topic!